I waited months to do this expose so it could be done right, with no guesswork. The time has come to discuss the truth behind Tony Fauci and his SARS-Cov-2, now that I’ve found the money trail.
We begin with the Bill Gates connection.
Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
NEW YORK — The World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have announced a collaboration to increase coordination across the international vaccine community and create a Global Vaccine Action Plan. This plan will build on the successes of current work to achieve key milestones in the discovery, development and delivery of lifesaving vaccines to the most vulnerable populations in the poorest countries over the next decade.
The collaboration follows the January 2010 call by Bill and Melinda Gates for the next ten years to be the Decade of Vaccines. The Global Vaccine Action Plan will enable greater coordination across all stakeholder groups – national governments, multilateral organizations, civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organizations — and will identify critical policy, resource, and other gaps that must be addressed to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines.
The tired globalist dream of Unity, of convergence across all sectors of society… for pumping Central Government-approved biochemicals into your body with maximum efficiency and minimum dissent. While I don’t consider myself an anti-vaxxer, nothing I’ve read in any of these institutions’ relevant publications allows room for dissent or conscientious objection.
The structure of the Decade of Vaccines Collaboration includes a Leadership Council to provide oversight for the planning effort, a Steering Committee that holds the primary responsibility for developing the action plan, an International Advisory Committee to assist the Leadership Council in evaluating the action plan, and a Secretariat for administrative support.
Prof. Pedro Alonso, Director for the Institute for Global Health of Barcelona and Dr. Christopher Elias, President and CEO of PATH, have been appointed co-chairs of the Steering Committee and the Secretariat.
Alonso is an expert in African epidemiology, particularly malaria. Malaria is a good example of how treatment can be superior to vaccination. Here’s a chart of death rates to African malaria:
Sourced from http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2012/11/in-effect-then-this-effort-to-eliminate.html . Caption: “Malaria death rates worldwide in the 20th century. The top line includes sub-Saharan Africa. The bottom line excludes it. Note that the sub-Saharan death rate alone is even higher than the top (worldwide) graph. DDT was first widely used in the 1940’s. The highly successful campaign to ban DDT worldwide began in 1970.”
The lesson here is that “Vaccinations are the solution” is a purely political goal, one whose only realistic justification is a refusal to use pesticides or other environmental controls to restrict the spread of disease. In the context of malaria, instead of trying to control the mosquito population these vaccinators try to control the human population. In the context of COVID-19, note how Western governments were quick to impose punitive social controls upon their internal populations with almost no effort to close borders with China, the source of the plague.
“Vaccines are miracles,” said Prof. Alonso, “For just a few dollars per child, vaccines prevent disease and disability for a lifetime. We must make sure that people understand that vaccines are one of the best investments in health.”
Elias received his MD from the Jesuit-operated, private Creighton University and per Wikipedia, “In October 2011, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation formally announced the appointment of Elias to the position of president of its global development program. In this role, Elias is responsible of leading the foundation’s efforts in developing countries to overcome hunger, poverty and disease.”
The Leadership Council is comprised of:
Dr. Margaret Chan, Director General of WHO;
Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Director of NIAID, part of the National Institutes of Health;
Mr. Anthony Lake, Executive Director for UNICEF;
Ms. Joy Phumaphi, Chair of the International Advisory Committee and Executive Secretary, African Leaders Malaria Alliance
Dr. Tachi Yamada, President of Global Health at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation;
There he is. Fauci isn’t just Gates’ ally. He’s also the WHO Director General’s ally.
The Decade of Vaccines Collaboration expects to complete its work by mid-2012. At that time, all vaccine stakeholder groups will be responsible for implementing the action plan.
“We look forward to working with the global vaccine community to extend the benefits made possible by existing vaccines and new vaccines in development,” said Dr. Elias, “Together we can ensure that all children have a shot at a healthy life.”
You can find the action plan at this link:
Here’s an excerpt from the list of responsibilities from page 96:
Governments, as the main providers of immunization, should do the following:
Notice it’s governments being the main providers, not the manufacturers as a capitalist society would do.
Increase support for national immunization programmes and ensure financial sustainability by 2020.
The Gates Foundation wants taxpayers to pay the cost of its vaccination programs. Also, the timing makes the COVID-19 crisis a great excuse to fund a new, massive, mandatory, intrusive vaccination program.
Depending upon countries’ income and as economies grow, fund an increasing proportion of domestic immunization programmes, progressing to the full funding of domestic programmes, and then funding global immunization efforts.
“Our agenda at your expense.”
Develop and introduce laws, regulations, and policies that support immunization programmes and a secure, high-quality supply base, if necessary.
This is pure tyranny. If vaccinations are a good idea then why mandate them?
Develop region- and country-specific plans, together with other stakeholders in region/country.
Prioritize and assume full ownership of national immunization programmes in order to create equity-driven programmes that reach every community.
No dissent permitted.
Work with stakeholders within and outside governments.
Respond with timely information when public concerns are raised about safety and efficacy to sustain public trust.
Only deceivers care about maintaining public trust. Honest men can trust their reputations.
Ensure immunization programmes are adequately staffed with personnel who are well trained and given appropriate incentives to manage the programme and deliver services.
Increase awareness of the importance of immunization to improve a population’s health and its contributions to strengthening health systems and primary health care.
Effectively convey messages on vaccines to create demand.
Engage in dialogue with communities and media and use effective communications techniques to convey messages about vaccines and to address safety concerns.
Instead of permitting dissent.
Encourage and support research on vaccines and vaccination issues; and encourage education at all levels on vaccines.
Collaborate regionally and internationally in advocacy programmes, evidence sharing, and coordinated preparedness.
Participate in open dialogues with manufacturers to ensure affordability of current and new vaccines.
And the one you’ve been wanting to read:
Individuals and communities, as recipients of immunization, should do the following:
Understand the risk and benefits of vaccines and immunization, viewing this as part of being a responsible citizen.
Demand safe and effective immunization programmes as a right from their leaders and government, and hold leaders and government accountable for providing them.
Blame your politician, not the Gates Foundation.
Participate in public-health discussions and be involved in key decisions about
Participate and contribute to the immunization delivery process and convey the needs and perspectives of their communities to the policy-makers.
Your duty to the Global Vaccination Action Plan, dear reader, is informed consent. Your government will inform you and you will consent… as they are directed to by the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, AIDS activists and other globalist agencies.
But my work isn’t done. Fauci joined an international cabal of vaccine activists and a decade later, is demanding vaccinations as a solution to a public health threat consistent with his allies’ timetable. Well, that’s at least consistent and he’s not the first bureaucrat to approach a problem with a preexisting agenda.
It’s time for the smoking gun.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan
By Christina Lin, 22 April 2020
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, a recent article in the British newspaper Daily Mail revealed.
Back in October 2014, the US government had placed a federal moratorium on gain-of-function (GOF) research – altering natural pathogens to make them more deadly and infectious – as a result of rising fears about a possible pandemic caused by an accidental or deliberate release of these genetically engineered monster germs.
This is the first time I ever heard about medical researchers INTENTIONALLY WEAPONIZING INFECTIOUS DISEASES just to find how much worse the diseases could become. Truly, the Hippocratic Oath is a dead letter.
More than that, can you imagine a guy wanting to push acceptance of vaccinations being asked to create a more deadly version of a disease? What if you could make it vulnerable to a vaccine while you were about it, and then “accidentally” released it?
This was in part due to lab accidents at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in July 2014 that raised questions about biosafety at US high-containment labs.
At that time, the CDC had closed two labs and halted some biological shipments in the wake of several incidents in which highly pathogenic microbes were mishandled by US government laboratories: an accidental shipment of live anthrax, the discovery of forgotten live smallpox samples and a newly revealed incident in which a dangerous influenza strain was accidentally shipped from the CDC to another lab.
My fellow Americans, your tax dollars at work. I get in trouble for losing a hammer at work… I hope whoever lost the live anthrax at least lost their job.
A CDC internal report described how scientists failed to follow proper procedures to ensure samples were inactivated before they left the lab, and also found “multiple other problems” with operating procedures in the anthrax lab.
As such in October 2014, because of public health concerns, the US government banned all federal funding on efforts to weaponize three viruses – influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
Now you know why I’ve been calling it SARS-Cov-2 in this post instead of my usual, sarcastic Wuhan Whoop. America’s CDC was weaponizing SARS as a “research effort” before, thank God, it came to its senses.
Here’s some independent confirmation. Segue:
17 October 2014
In light of recent concerns regarding biosafety and biosecurity, effective immediately, the U.S. Government (USG) will pause new USG funding for gain-of-function research on influenza, MERS or SARS viruses, as defined below. This research funding pause will be effective until a robust and broad deliberative process is completed that results in the adoption of a new USG gain-of-function research policy. Restrictions on new funding will apply as follows:
New USG funding will not be released for gain-of-function research projects that may be reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route. The research funding pause would not apply to characterization or testing of naturally occurring influenza, MERS, and SARS viruses, unless the tests are reasonably anticipated to increase transmissibility and/or pathogenicity.
That’s why the scientists were test bat-sourced SARS instead of human-sourced SARS, to make use of this funding loophole.
In parallel, we will encourage the currently-funded USG and non-USG funded research
community to join in adopting a voluntary pause on research that meets the stated definition.
That didn’t happen.
In the face of a moratorium in the US, Dr Anthony Fauci – the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and currently the leading doctor in the US Coronavirus Task Force – outsourced in 2015 the GOF research to China’s Wuhan lab and licensed the lab to continue receiving US government funding.
The Wuhan lab is now at the center of scrutiny for possibly releasing the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and causing the global Covid-19 pandemic.
It is understandable that the Chinese lab likely struggled with safety issues given the fact US labs share similar problems, and indeed in January 2018 the US Embassy in Beijing sent cables warning about the safety of the Wuhan lab and asked for help.
Let’s get independent confirmation on this revelation that Fauci was funding the development of his SARS-Cov-2 at the Wuhan lab after the American CDC banned his work on SARS as a national security threat.
Dr Anthony Fauci backed $7.4m funding for controversial Wuhan lab blamed for causing Covid-19 by conspiracy theorists
By Patrick Knox, 29 April 2020
Dr Fauci’s National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) allegedly shelled out $7.4 million to the Wuhan laboratory, which was studying bats with coronavirus.
In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health (NID) committed $3.7 million over six years for research in Wuhan, reports Newsweek.
The program followed another $3.7 million, five-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million.
Interesting that the release was within a year of the initial funding end.
US intelligence, after originally insisting the coronavirus had occurred naturally, have conceded that the coronavirus may have originated in a leak from the Wuhan lab.
US intelligence tried to cover for Fauci.
All US government funding to the lab was reportedly stopped last week.
NIH defended their funding in a statement to Newsweek.
“Most emerging human viruses come from wildlife, and these represent a significant threat to public health and biosecurity in the US and globally,” the statement read.
More in a moment on this statement.
“Scientific research indicates that there is no evidence that suggests the virus was created in a laboratory.”
More lies. I am sick of being lied to.
US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research
By Sara Reardon, 19 December 2017
The US government has lifted its controversial ban on funding experiments that make certain pathogens more deadly or transmissible. On 19 December, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that scientists can once again use federal money to conduct ‘gain-of-function’ research on pathogens such as influenza viruses. But the agency also said that researchers’ grant applications will undergo greater scrutiny than in the past.
Announced less than a week before Christmas, when everybody was closing down for two weeks of hectic holidays. Maybe it was just a coincidence… but there’s no reason the announcement could not have waited another month, when the watchdogs would have been back on duty.
The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters.
The NIH announcement ends a moratorium on gain-of-function research that began in October 2014. Back then, some researchers argued that the agency’s ban — which singled out research on the viruses that cause flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) — was too broad. The 21 projects halted by the policy included studies of seasonal flu and efforts to develop vaccines.
We can guess at who those “some researchers” are: the Gates Foundation.
The NIH eventually allowed ten of these studies to proceed, but three projects using the MERS virus and eight dealing with flu remained ineligible for US government grants — until now.
While the ban was in effect, the NIH and other government agencies examined the costs and benefits of allowing gain-of-function research. In 2016, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) — an independent panel that advises the NIH’s parent, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — concluded that very few government-funded gain-of-function experiments posed a significant threat to public health.
And yet, here we are today, just three years later.
The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review.
What a convenient loophole for the Decade of Vaccines.
Scientists have long debated the merits of gain-of-function research and the new decision could reopen that discussion.
NSABB chair Samuel Stanley, the president of Stony Brook University in New York, is pleased that the new rules do not ban gain-of-function research outright. “Basic research on these agents by laboratories that have shown they can do this work safely is key to global security,” he said in a statement. But Stanley fears the changes came at a cost: the three-year moratorium may have delayed research and reduced interest in research on these pathogens. “I believe nature is the ultimate bioterrorist and we need to do all we can to stay one step ahead,” he said.
Projection! Bioterrorism is the use of disease to advance a political agenda. Nature obviously does not have a political agenda. I didn’t believe accusations that China released SARS-Cov-2 as a bioweapon because it had no motivation to kill its own people, plus the disease targeted Asians more effectively than us white Americans. I don’t believe USA released it as a false flag, either, because Chinese espionage against us–to say nothing of the control they’ve achieved over the California state government, among other North American governments– is more than enough justification for war.
But Fauci releasing his SARS-Cov-2 when his first round of funding dried up, to create a global plague for which he can present himself, his allies and his vaccines as the cure to, would have every motivation to cause a lab “oopsie” resulting in a global pandemic.
Or maybe it was an unfortunate accident and Fauci, who paid for the creation of SARS-Cov-2, just happened to be the guy put in charge of America’s response to SARS-Cov-2. We now have several effective treatments for it now but no, Fauci wants a vaccine developed. Only a vaccine will do.
Yoshihiro Kawaoka, a virologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, whose work was affected by the moratorium, says the new framework is “an important accomplishment”. Kawaoka, who studies how molecular changes in the avian flu virus could make it easier for birds to transmit to humans, now plans to apply for federal funding to experiment with live versions of the virus.
Kawaoka was playing with H5N1 bird flu. I do not care what justifications they can invent, any scientist who intentionally creates a more dangerous version of a disease needs to have his work thrown into the incinerator, followed by the scientist himself. How the FORK do these people get PhDs without ever learning to not play with matches?
But Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, says that gain-of-function studies “have done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics — yet they risked creating an accidental pandemic”. He argues that such experiments should not happen at all. But if the government is going to fund them, Lipsitch says, he is glad there will be an extra level of review.
Marc get the final word. SARS-Cov-2 was created on Fauci’s watch, with taxpayer funding authorized by Fauci, to get around a CDC moratorium on deliberately making plagues more dangerous… a practice that even insiders don’t believe has been useful to the safety of humanity.
Fauci is personally and specifically responsible for SARS-Cov-2, and his insistence on vaccination as the only sufficient response to it… and shutting down as much of America as he can in the meantime… qualifies him as a bioterrorist: using the disease made on his watch to forward his preexisting political agenda.