Magnus Söderlund: Cannibalism Is Our Future

This post is Not Safe For Lunch.

It’s no joke that our Elites hate us with a seething, black hatred born from their sexual attraction to the disgusting. I blogged previously on an Australian “food scientist” who thought tricking normies into eating cockroach protein was a great idea. Now a second corprophagist turns up in Sweden.

Executive Committee members | EMAC

Forskning - Hur dina nöjda kunder påverkar konkurrenterna ...

He gives off a Jordan B. Peterson kind of vibe:

Jordan Peterson-izing The Ben Op | The American Conservative

The main article for this post is classified as a commentary but seems as authoritative as a non-Swedish speaker can expect to find.

Swedish Researcher Pushes Eating Human Flesh as Answer to Future Climate Change Food Shortages

By Celia Faber, 4 September 2019

Right off the bat, we can notice that they’re raising cannibalism as an “answer” to FUTURE food shortages. It’s solving a problem that doesn’t exist but the globalists are certain it will. How can they be confident in that prediction unless it’s the future they intend to create on purpose? And why, if they want to develop a preemptive solution, are they not considering ocean farming or something?

Climate Change alarmism has taken a macabre turn that will seem to be satire, but is not. It happened in Sweden.

At a summit for food of the future (the climate-ravaged future) called Gastro Summit, in Stockholm Sept 3-4, a professor held a powerpoint presentation asserting that we must “awaken the idea” of eating human flesh in the future, as a way of combatting the effects of climate change.

In the 1960s, humanity died to nuclear winter. In the ’70s, we died to overpopulation. In the ’80s, we were incinerated by holes in the ozone layer. In the ’90s, we drowned when the polar ice caps melted. In the ’00s, we actually were decimated by weaponized migration. And now in the ’10s, the globalists tell us deplorables to just die already.

New for the ’20s, we died to feed our new, vibrant neighbors with our flesh “just like Jesus did”. [Insert tasteless Eucharist joke.]

In a talk titled “Can you Imagine Eating Human Flesh?” behavioral scientist and marketing strategist Magnus Söderlund from “Handelshögskolan” (College of Commerce) argues for the breaking down of the ancient taboos against desecrating the human corpse and eating human flesh.

Magnus is a government-sponsored necrophile. There is no legitimate reason to break the very well-justified taboo of cannibalism for the sake of PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES. Is there a learning curve for “how to eat people instead of beef”? You chew, swallow and in 10-20 years, you get Mad Carl Disease.

They say it makes your brain spongy.

He refers to the taboos against it as “conservative,” and discusses people’s resistance to it as a problem that could be overcome, little by little, beginning with persuading people to just taste it. He can be seen in his video presentation and on State Swedish Television channel TV4 saying that since food sources will be scarce in the future, people must be introduced to eating things they have thus far considered disgusting–among them, human flesh.

Easier sells he suggests include: pets and insects.

Poodle, the other white meat. “Dad, will Lassie be with us in Heaven?” “No, son, Lassie will be with us in the supermarket, for sale by the pound.”

But human flesh was the central topic. In Swedish articles describing this new debate, the term “mannisko-kötts branschen” is introduced. This means “the human flesh industry.”

In his bio at the Stockholm School of Economics, Söderlund states that his research focus includes: “consumer behavior,” ” marketing stimuli,” “loyalty, emotions, justice perceptions,” “psychological reactions,” …”in a society increasingly obsessed with consumption.”

People can be “tricked” Soderlund teases, into “making the right decisions.”

These people are loathsome, freakish monsters. They intend to force us to eat our dead while they watch and masturbate from ivory towers. Conservatism didn’t conserve gendered bathrooms; soon, it will fail to conserve sliced bread.

Conflating resistance to eating human flesh with capitalist selfishness, the seminar’s talking points ask:

“Are we humans too selfish to live sustainably?”

Magnus, are you too selfish to fuck your mother? It might be considered taboo for the moment by overly conservative individuals but for most male feminists, Mom is the cheapest and most accessible source of erotic pleasure. And when you’re done with her, she’s a month’s worth of protein!

“Is Cannibalism the solution to food sustainability in the future? Does Generation Z have the answers to our food challenges? Can consumers be tricked into making the right decisions?At GastroSummit you will get some answers to these questions—and also partake in the latest scientific findings and get to meet the leading experts.”

Experts like MEEE, who don’t have the first clue if what we preach is a good idea but we’re paid very well to preach it! And who believe “scientific” means “nobody pays you unlicensed peasants to think”.

In his talk, Söderlund asks the audience how many would be open to the idea. Not many hands go up. Some groaning is heard. When interviewed after his talk, he reports brightly that 8 percent of conference participants said they would be open to trying it. When asked if he himself would try it, he replies: “I feel somewhat hesitant but to not appear overly conservative…I’d have to say….I’d be open to at least tasting it.”

I can’t say which is worse, the possibility that he’s a total hypocrite about cannibalism or the possibility that he already eats corpses for pleasure.

The logo for the talk, titled: “Food Of The Future: Worms, Grasshoppers, or Human Flesh,” features a splash of blood as part of the graphic design.

What Söderlund does not mention, curiously, is the long documented science—the biological effect of cannibalism.

Check your privilege, Celia! You can’t expect a totalitarian globalist raping your taboos to know literally everything. Who made you an expert, anyway? The government? No!

A tribe called the Fore lived isolated in Papua New Guinea until the 1930s. They believed in eating their dead rather than allowing them to be consumed by worms. This led to an epidemic of a disease called “kuru, or “the laughing death,” caused by ingestion of human meat. This disease was not caused by a pathogen, but rather, a “twisted protein,” (according to an NPR report) that tricks “other proteins in the brain to twist like it, damaging the brain’s cerebellum. Researchers compared it to Dr. Jekyll’s transformation. The last victim of kuru died in 2009.

Your word for the day: the word prion derives from “proteinaceous infectious particle”. As in Mad Cow Disease and kuru. They’re proteins misshapen in such a way as to cause more misshapen proteins. There’s no cure and it really does have a 10+ year onset.

There are a few cultures that eat insects; think Cameroon. But there’s not one society on Earth since PNG’s Fore that eats people. Magnus thinks we should change that for everybody because at some point in the future, somebody somewhere will be hungry.

Whoever is in charge of Sweden’s Public Relations is doing an abysmal job. Unless the new brand is that this small Northern country, obsessed with atheism and political correctness, is now cooler than ever for re-setting all previously known boundaries of “noir.” And madness.

Oh, they’re being smart about it. All slick sales and marketing professionals and starting early. It’s alarming that he’s still employed and wasn’t booed off the stage. Granted, Magnus is not the sanest economist available for rent but the others all surprised themselves by having principles.

According to the Eurpoean Marketing Confederation,,

Professor Söderlund is Professor of Marketing and Head of the Center for Consumer Marketing (CCM) at the Stockholm School of Economics. He received his PhD in 1993, became associate professor in 1998 and full professor in 2008.

His current research interests comprise customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and service encounters.

So, this guy advocating the consumption of insects and humans as food staples is not a nutritionist, biologist, anthropologist or medical expert. He’s an economist specializing in consumer behavior. His only professional interest in the topic is how people can be mindfucked into accepting it.

Who pays his bills?


One thought on “Magnus Söderlund: Cannibalism Is Our Future

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s